You can see a comparison here I used some of the Advanced configuration functions in my tests, and some functions, like the Dereverb module, are available only in the Advanced version.
If you experience either of these problems, iZotope is worth a look, and there is a ten-day free trial available.įor the record, there are two iZotope versions, RX 3 (regularly $349, on sale for $249), and RX 3 Advanced ($1,199/$749). Though I haven’t finished my testing, I’m leaning towards a similar conclusion for noise reduction, though in each instance, Audition CC seemed to outperform Audition CS6. All before-and-after files are included below so you can hear the problem and how well each program resolved it.Īs a preview, though I’ve sworn by Audition’s Auto Heal function since it appeared many years and many versions ago, I produced much better results faster with iZotope’s Spectral Repair, which performs the same function. How I Testedįor all these tasks, I came up with a sample file or two, and performed the function in RX 3, Adobe Audition CC, and Audition CS6.
This isn’t a full review of RX 3 just a comparison with Audition for these video-related functions. In the first of this two-part article, I’ll focus on declipping and crackle-and-pop removal in the second I’ll compare functionality for noise and echo/reverb removal. Since I’m primarily a shooter/editor, as opposed to an audio guy, I figured I would focus on those problems that occur most frequently in my productions. So when I saw the press release on iZotope RX 3, I wondered, does this provide any functions I can’t get in Audition, or perform any functions better? Not only is the price right, you get roundtrip editing with other CC tools like Adobe Premiere Pro. For many Creative Cloud users, Adobe Audition is the obvious choice for audio editor.